1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (‘the Company’), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2024, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Statement of Cash Flow and the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year then ended, and notes to the standalone financial statements, including material accounting policy and other explanatory information.
2. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Companies Act, 2013 (‘the Act’) in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the Indian Accounting Standards (‘Ind AS’) specified under section 133 of the Act read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 and other accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2024, and its profit (including other comprehensive income), its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.
BASIS FOR OPINION
3. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under section 143(10) of the Act. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (‘ICAI’) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements under the provisions of the Act and the rules thereunder, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
KEY AUDIT MATTERS
4. Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the standalone financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
5. We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.
Key Audit Matter
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
|
(i) Uncertainties on ultimate outcome of the ongoing investigation being
|
Our audit included, but was not limited to, the following
|
conducted by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’) and
|
procedures:
|
inspection being conducted by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs under
|
• Obtained understanding of management process and controls relating to identification and evaluation of
|
Section 206(5) of the Act
|
proceedings and investigations at different levels in the
|
(Refer notes 56 of the standalone financial statements)
The Company, one the current KMP and one of its subsidiaries is involved
|
Company;
|
in the ongoing investigation being conducted by the Securities and
|
• Evaluated the design and tested the operating
|
Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’) with respect to certain transactions in
|
effectiveness of key controls around above process;
|
earlier years with the vendors of the Company and one of the subsidiary
|
• Obtained and reviewed the various show cause notices,
|
companies. Pursuant to the above, SEBI has issued various summons
|
orders, letters, summons and follow up requests from SEBI
|
and sought comments/information/explanations from the Company, its
|
and MCA;
|
subsidiary and certain directors (including former directors), KMPs who
|
have provided or are in process of providing the information requested.
|
• Obtained and evaluated the response, information and documents submitted by the Company, its subsidiary,
|
The Company had also received a follow-up communication from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (‘MCA’) for the ongoing inspection under
|
directors and KMPs;
|
section 206(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 against which the Company
|
• Reviewed the documents in hand (agreements, MOUs,
|
had submitted its response.
|
purchase orders, invoices, bank statements, Board approvals and other required approvals) for transactions
|
The management has informed the Board that based on its review of
|
highlighted in the show cause notice and summons at
|
records of the Company/ subsidiary, the transactions (including refunds) relating to the Company/subsidiary were against consideration for valid
|
Company/subsidiary level;
|
goods and services received.
The Board of Directors of the Company continues to monitor the progress
|
• Reviewed the work performed by Internal auditors on the agreed scope;
|
of aforesaid matters and have also appointed Independent advisory
|
• Verified the conclusion of the erstwhile auditors and
|
committee to review the allegations.
|
internal auditors including Advisory report submitted by SEBI based on Examination carried out in earlier years on the same transactions in earlier years;
|
Key Audit Matter
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
|
Based on the available information, the management does not expect any
|
• Obtained and evaluated the scope of work agreed with
|
material adverse impact on the Company/ Subsidiary with respect to the
|
Independent Advisory Committee and the conclusions of
|
above and accordingly, believes that no adjustments are required to the
|
the committee;
|
accompanying statement.
|
• Reviewed the legal opinion obtained by the management
|
Considering the uncertainty associated with the ultimate outcome of
|
on the ongoing regulatory actions against the Company
|
the investigation/ findings of independent advisory and significance of
|
concluding that the investigation is at fact finding stage
|
management judgement involved in assessing the future outcome and
|
and no conclusion has been formed; and
|
determining the required disclosure, this was considered to be a key audit matter in the audit of the standalone financial statements.
|
• Evaluated the adequacy of disclosures given in the standalone financial statements with regard to regulatory
|
Further, the aforementioned matter as fully explained in Note 56 to the standalone financial statements is also considered fundamental to the user’s understanding of the standalone financial statements.
|
action.
|
(ii) Litigation for termination of Merger Co-operation agreement (Refer notes
|
Our audit included, but was not limited to, the following
|
30 and 55 of the standalone financial statements)
|
procedures:
|
The Board of Directors of the Company, on 21 December 2021, had
|
• Obtained understanding of management process and
|
approved the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230 to 232
|
controls relating to implementation of the Merger Scheme
|
of the Companies Act, 2013 (Scheme), whereby the Company and
|
and evaluated the design and tested the operating
|
Bang la Entertainment Private Limited (BEPL) an affiliate of Culver
|
effectiveness of key controls around above process;
|
Max Entertainment Private Limited (Culver Max). Both the parties had been engaged in the process of obtaining the necessary approvals for completing the merger. The Company has incurred expenses aggregating to I 2,784 million during the year (and aggregating to I 4,618 million upto
|
• Obtained and reviewed the terms and conditions mentioned in the MCA and Company’s compliance position with those terms and conditions;
|
date) pursuant to such scheme of merger which have been disclosed under exceptional items in the relevant period.
|
• Obtained and reviewed the correspondence (including termination notice, arbitration notice, replies, NCLT filings,
|
However, on 22 January 2024, Culver Max and BEPL have issued a notice to the Company purporting to terminate the Merger co-operation
|
SIAC filings) between the Company, Culver Max and BEPL to corroborate our understanding of the matter;
|
Agreement (‘MCA’) and sought termination fee of USD 90,000,000 (United States Dollars Ninety Million) and alleged breaches by the Company of the terms of the MCA, they have also initiated arbitration for the same before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and is currently
|
• Reviewed the legal opinion from independent legal counsel obtained by the management with respect to termination of MCA;
|
pending as at reporting date.
|
• Assessed management decision to continue to classify
|
The Management, based on legal tenability, progress of the arbitration and relying on the legal opinion obtained from independent legal counsel has determined that the above claims against the Company including towards termination fees is not tenable and does not expect any
|
the excluded entities in the MCA as Non-current assets held for sale in accordance with Ind AS 105 - Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations on its intention to continue with merger;
|
material adverse impact on the Company with respect to the above and
|
• Tested on sample basis the merger cost recorded
|
accordingly, no adjustments are required to the accompanying standalone
|
as exceptional items in the standalone financial
|
financial statement.
|
statements; and
|
Considering the amounts involved are material and the application of
|
• Evaluated the adequacy of disclosures given in the
|
accounting principles as given under Ind AS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (‘Ind AS 37’), in order to determine the amounts to be recognised as liability or to be disclosed as a contingent liability or not, is inherently subjective and needs careful evaluation and significant judgement to be applied by the management, this matter is considered to be a key audit matter for the current period audit.
|
standalone financial statements with regard to litigation.
|
Further, the aforementioned matter as fully explained in Note 55 to the standalone financial statements is also considered fundamental to the user’s understanding of the standalone financial statements.
|
|
Key Audit Matter
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
|
(iii) Litigation with Star India Private Limited for the ICC Contract (Refer
|
Our audit included, but was not limited to, the following
|
notes 37 of the standalone financial statements)
|
procedures:
|
On 26 August 2022, the Company had entered into an agreement with
|
• Obtained an understanding of the Alliance agreement
|
Star India Private Limited (“Star”) for setting out the basis on which
|
along with the conditions mentioned therein and
|
Star would be willing to grant sub-license rights in relation to television
|
management’s compliance with those conditions;
|
broadcasting rights of the International Cricket Council’s (ICC) Men’s and
|
|
Under 19 (U-19) global events for a period of four years (ICC 2024-2027)
|
• Obtained and reviewed the correspondence between the
|
on an exclusive basis (‘Alliance Agreement’). The performance of the
|
Company and Star along with the letters sent through legal
|
Alliance Agreement was subject to certain conditions precedent including
|
counsel and the arbitration application filed;
|
submission of financial commitments, provision of bank guarantee and
|
• Evaluated the response received from the external legal
|
corporate guarantee and pending final ICC approval for sub-licensing to
|
counsel to ensure that the conclusions reached are
|
the Company.
|
supported by sufficient legal rationale;
|
Till date, the Company has accrued I 721 million for Bank Guarantee
|
• Involved Auditor’s expert to corroborate conclusions
|
Commission and interest expenses for its share of Bank Guarantee and
|
reached by the external legal counsel;
|
Deposit as per the alliance agreement.
|
|
|
• Verified the invoices received for interest cost on deposits
|
During the year, Star has sent letters to the Company through its legal
|
and bank guarantee and also verified the payment made
|
counsel alleging breach of the Alliance agreement on account of non-
|
by the Company against those invoices; and
|
payment of dues for the rights in relation to first instalment of the rights
|
|
fee aggregating to USD 203.56 million (I 16,934 million) along-with the
|
Evaluated the adequacy of disclosures given in the standalone
|
payment for Bank Guarantee commission and deposit interest aggregating
|
financial statements with regard to litigation.
|
I 170 million and financial commitments including furnishing of corporate
|
|
guarantee/ confirmation as stated in the Alliance Agreement.
|
|
On 14 March 2024, Star initiated arbitration proceedings against the
|
|
Company under the Arbitration Rules of the London Court of International
|
|
Arbitration and sought to specific performance of the Alliance Agreement
|
|
(or alternatively, to pay damages).
|
|
Based on the legal advice, the management believes that Star has not
|
|
acted in accordance with the Alliance Agreement, and has failed to
|
|
obtain necessary approvals, execution of necessary documentation and
|
|
agreements. The management also believes that Star by its conduct
|
|
has breached the Alliance Agreement and is in default of terms thereof
|
|
and consequently, the contracts stands repudiated and accordingly, the
|
|
Company does not expect any material adverse impact with respect to
|
|
the above and hence no adjustments were required to the accompanying
|
|
standalone financial statements.
|
|
Considering the amounts involved are material and the application of
|
|
accounting principles as given under Ind AS 37, Provisions, Contingent
|
|
Liabilities and Contingent Assets (‘Ind AS 37’), in order to determine the
|
|
amounts to be recognised as liability or to be disclosed as a contingent
|
|
liability or not, is inherently subjective and needs careful evaluation and
|
|
significant judgement to be applied by the management, this matter is
|
|
considered to be a key audit matter for the current period audit.
|
|
Further, the aforementioned matter as fully explained in Note 37 to the
|
|
standalone financial statements is also considered fundamental to the
|
|
user’s understanding of the standalone financial statements.
|
|
Key Audit Matter
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
|
(iv) Provisions and contingent liabilities relating to taxation, litigations and
|
Our audit included, but was not limited to, the following
|
other claims
|
procedures:
|
As at 31 March 2024, the Company is involved in various litigations,
|
• Obtained an understanding of the management’s
|
arbitrations and claims with/against various authorities, related parties
|
process followed by the Company for assessment and
|
and erstwhile related parties of the Company.
|
determination of the amount of provisions and contingent
|
The most significant matters include:
|
liabilities on various litigations;
|
a)
|
Show cause notices received by the Company for Goods and Service tax (‘GST’) demands aggregating to INR 1,736 million (refer note 35 to the accompanying financial statements)
|
• Tested the design and implementation and testing operating effectiveness of key internal controls around the recognition and measurement of provisions and reassessment of contingent liabilities;
|
|
|
b)
|
Claims aggregating to INR 5,329 million and provision aggregating to INR 2,584 million for settlement of financial commitments and
|
• Assessed management’s conclusions through discussions
|
|
claims of receivables provided for/ revenue not recognised from an
|
held with the inhouse legal counsel and understanding
|
|
erstwhile related party (Refer note 44D(ii)A to the accompanying
|
precedents in similar cases;
|
|
financial statements)
|
• Obtained and evaluated the independent confirmations
|
c)
|
Arbitration for intercorporate deposits given to related parties
|
from the consultants representing the Company
|
aggregating to INR 1,706 million (Refer note 44D(ii)B to the
|
before the various authorities including examination of
|
|
accompanying financial statements)
|
correspondences connected with the cases;
|
d)
|
Arbitration for invocation of guarantee by customer of subsidiary of
|
• Obtained the independent legal opinion for certain
|
the Company (‘Railtel’) aggregating to INR 809.
|
matters such as GST, Railtel matter, financial commitment of an erstwhile related party, LOC and lease cancellation
|
|
e)
|
LOC (Letter of Comfort) issued in earlier years to Yes Bank (Refer note 38 to the accompanying financial statements)
|
by Government authority for confirming the likelihood of the the outcome of the said litigations and potential impact on Financial Statements;
|
f)
|
Dispute with respect to cancellation of lease by government
|
|
authorities for one of the subsidiary companies (Refer note 58 to
|
• Evaluated adequacy of provisions created and carried by
|
|
the accompanying financial statements)
|
management on the litigations;
|
Most
|
of these litigations involve complex issues and certain matters
|
• Involved auditors’ experts in assessing the nature and
|
also form part of matters of enquiry/summons issued by SEBI to various
|
amount of GST show cause and assessed the technical
|
stakeholders. The Company assisted by their external legal counsel
|
merits based on the correspondence and assessments
|
assesses the need to make provision or disclose a contingency on a case-to-case basis considering the underlying facts of each litigation.
|
from the relevant tax authorities;
|
|
|
• Assessed the amounts provided for such receivables is
|
As at 31 March 2024, the amounts involved are significant. The provisions
|
adequate to cover any further financial loss and whether
|
and
|
contingent liabilities are subject to changes in the outcomes of
|
the classification of the litigation is appropriate as per Ind
|
litigations and claims and the positions taken by the Company.
|
AS 37; and
|
Considering the materiality of transactions and significant judgements
|
Evaluated the adequacy of disclosures given in the standalone
|
involved in establishing whether a liability/provision should be recognised
|
financial statements, including disclosure of exceptional items,
|
or disclosed as a contingent liability in the standalone financial statements,
|
contingent liabilities and movement in provision created.
|
such
|
ongoing litigations are considered to be a key audit matter in the
|
|
current year.
|
|
Key Audit Matter
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
|
(v) Recoverability of content advances and media content inventory valuation
|
Our audit included, but was not limited to the following
|
(Refer note: 2M, 3G 3K, 11 and 12 of Standalone financial statements)
|
procedures:
|
The Company held inventories aggregating I 65,841 million as at 31
|
Content advances
|
March 2024 comprising of raw tapes, media content (i.e. programmes, film
|
• Obtained an understanding of management’s
|
rights, music rights) and under production-media contents.
|
process for authorisation of content advances and its
|
Further, the Company also pays advances for acquiring content from
|
recoverability assessment;
|
production houses out of which I 4.400 million are outstanding as at 31
|
• Evaluated the appropriateness of related accounting
|
March 2024 (net of provision of I 395 million). These advances are paid
|
policies adopted by the Company in accordance with the
|
on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and/or agreements entered into with the respective production houses.
|
requirements of Ind AS 2;
• Evaluated the design, implementation and tested the
|
The cost incurred on acquisition of inventory is amortised on straight
|
operating effectiveness of key controls that the Company
|
line basis over the estimated period of use or estimated future revenue potential as estimated by the management. The factors that the Company
|
has in relation to aforesaid process;
|
considers in determining the amortisation policy has been derived basis
|
• Obtained supporting documents for the sample of
|
historical trends and management’s expectation of revenue earning
|
movie advances paid during the year which includes the
|
potential of such media content.
During the year, the Company has recorded an amortization expense of I
|
MOU/agreement executed between the Company and production houses;
|
34,133 million (including accelerated amortisation of I 563 million for net
|
• Obtained supporting documents for refund/adjustment/
|
realisable value),
|
assignment of advances for other content on sample basis;
|
At each reporting period end, management assesses the recoverability
|
• Obtained direct confirmation from the production houses
|
of (i) content advances which involves significant judgment on part of
|
confirming the outstanding balances as at the year-end
|
management with regard to status of completion of the project for which
|
including identification of the films against which the
|
advances are given, and (ii) inventory which involves determining whether
|
advances were given and the manner of utilisation of the
|
there is any objective evidence indicating that the net realisable value of
|
advances by such production houses, where considered
|
any item of inventory is below its carrying value. If so, such inventories are written down to their net realisable value in accordance with the
|
necessary in our professional judgement; and
|
requirements of Ind AS 2, Inventories (‘Ind AS 2’).
|
• Evaluated management’s assessment of stage of completion of projects for which the advances were given,
|
Considering the inherent nature of the industry, particularly on the
|
and related judgement in determining the adequacy of
|
changing viewing patterns of the content and quality of content as identified by end-users, determination of appropriate amortisation policy
|
provision for doubtful advances.
|
and provision for net realisable value involves significant judgement and
|
Inventory valuation
|
estimates by the management and accordingly, the recoverability of
|
• Obtained an understanding of process followed for
|
content advances and inventory valuation has been considered as key
|
identifying amortisation period of inventory and estimating
|
audit matter for the current period audit.
|
its net realisable value;
• Evaluated the nature, source and reliability of all the information used by the management for arriving at the estimates for amortisation period and provision for net realisable value of inventories;
• Discussed with respective business heads in the Company on expectations for performance of content to corroborate the forecasts;
• Assessed the projected sale estimates made by the management in respect of balance inventory of aforesaid specific media content that is expected to be sold in the near future, for its appropriateness basis past trends and market conditions;
• Obtained understanding of management’s assessment of the parties/ entities and association with whom such contracts has been entered;
• Tested mathematical accuracy in respect of amortisation and provision for doubtful advances and provision for net realisable value recorded in the books;
Evaluated appropriateness of disclosures made in the
standalones financial statements
|
Key Audit Matter
|
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
|
(vi) Recoverability of Investment in Subsidiaries carried at cost, valuation
|
Our audit included, but was not limited to, the following
|
of Optionally Convertible Debenture (“OCD”) in subsidiaries carried at
|
procedures:
|
FVTPL and impairment assessment of Goodwill of regional channel and
|
• Obtained an understanding of the management’s process
|
online media
|
for identification of impairment indicators for recoverability
|
(Refer Note 7, 8 and 13 of Standalone financial statements and note 2Y,
|
of investments in subsidiaries, impairment assessment of
|
2Nii, 3D, to material accounting policy information)
|
Goodwill of regional channel and online media business including identification of CGUs and valuation of OCD
|
- The Company has investments of I 5,429 million in subsidiaries,
|
issued by subsidiaries;
|
being carried at cost in accordance with Ind AS 27 “Separate
|
• Tested the design and operating effectiveness of internal
|
Financial Statements” along with investment in Optionally
|
controls of the Company in relation to the aforesaid process;
|
convertible debentures ( OCD”) in subsidiaries amounting to I
|
2,103 million, being carried at fair value through profit and loss in
|
• Evaluated management’s identification of CGUs for the
|
accordance with Ind AS 109 “Financial Instruments”, as at 31 March
|
purpose of Goodwill impairment testing;
|
2024.
|
• Reconciled the cash flows to the business plans approved by the respective Board of Directors of the subsidiaries;
|
- The Company also has goodwill balance of I 1,261 million relating
|
to Online Media Business and Regional channel in India.
|
• I nvolved auditor’s experts to assess the appropriateness of the valuation methodology used for calculation of the
|
- The Company assesses the recoverability of investment in
|
recoverable value of the investment in subsidiaries and
|
subsidiaries by way of equity and OCDs, when impairment
|
goodwill by the management and its experts;
|
indicators exist, by comparing the fair value (less costs of disposal)
|
• Involved auditor’s expert to assess the appropriateness of
|
and carrying amount of that investment as on the reporting date.
|
the valuation of OCD investment;
|
Further, the carrying value of goodwill is tested for impairment on
|
an annual basis as required under Ind AS 36, ‘Impairment of Assets’
|
• Evaluated and challenged management’s assumptions
|
(‘Ind AS 36’).
|
such as implied growth rates during explicit period, terminal growth rate, revenue multiples of comparable companies
|
Management’s process of identification of Cash Generating Unit (CGU),
|
and discount rate for their appropriateness based on our
|
identification of impairment indications and estimate of the recoverable
|
understanding of the business of the respective investee
|
values of the investments and goodwill determined through discounted
|
companies and CGUs, past results and external factors
|
cash flow and market multiple method requires significant judgment in
|
such as industry trends and forecasts;
|
carrying out the impairment assessment.
|
• Performed independent sensitivity analysis of aforesaid
|
The key assumptions used include, but are not limited to projections of
|
key assumptions to assess the effect of reasonably
|
future cash flows growth rates, discount rates, estimated future operating,
|
possible variations on the current estimated recoverable
|
capital expenditure and revenue multiples of comparable companies.
|
amount for each of the identified investments and for
|
Changes to these assumptions could lead to material changes in estimated
|
respective CGUs to evaluate sufficiency of headroom
|
recoverable amounts, resulting in either impairment or reversals of
|
available between recoverable value and carrying amount;
|
impairment taken in prior years.
|
• Tested the mathematical accuracy of the management computations regarding cash flows and sensitivity
|
Considering the materiality and the inherent subjectivity involved in
|
analysis; and
|
management’s judgments and estimates, recoverability of investments in
|
subsidiaries, valuation of OCDs in subsidiaries and impairment assessment
|
Evaluated the adequacy of disclosures given in the standalone
|
of Goodwill has been considered to be a key audit matter for the current
|
financial statements, including disclosure of significant
|
period audit.
|
assumptions, judgements, sensitivity analysis performed, in accordance with applicable accounting standards.
|
INFORMATION OTHER THAN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDITOR’S REPORT THEREON
6. The Company’s Board of Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report but does not include the standalone financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The Annual Report is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditor's report.
Our opinion on the standalone financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the standalone financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above when it becomes available and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the standalone financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
When we read the Annual Report, if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are required to communicate the matter to those charged with governance.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF MANAGEMENT AND THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE FOR THE STANDALONE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
7. The accompanying standalone financial statements have been approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company’s Board of Directors are responsible for the matters stated in section 134(5) of the Act with respect to the preparation and presentation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance including other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the Ind AS specified under section 133 of the Act and other accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal
financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
8. I n preparing the financial statements, the Board of Directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
9. Those Board of Directors are also responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE STANDALONE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Standards on Auditing will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
11. As part of an audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing, specified under section 143(10) of the Act we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control;
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. Under section 143(3)(i) of the Act we are also responsible for expressing our opinion on whether the Company has adequate internal financial controls with reference to financial statements in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls;
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management;
• Conclude on the appropriateness of Board of Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events
or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern; and
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation;
12. We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
13. We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
14. From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
15. As required by section 197(16) of the Act based on our audit, we report that the Company has paid remuneration to its directors during the year in accordance with the provisions of and limits laid down under section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.
16. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 (‘the Order’) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of section 143(11) of the Act we give in the Annexure I, a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent applicable.
17. Further to our comments in Annexure I, as required by section 143(3) of the Act based on our audit, we report, to the extent applicable, that:
a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit of the accompanying standalone financial statements;
b) I n our opinion, proper books of account as required by law relating to preparation of the aforesaid standalone financial statements have been kept so far as it appears from our examination of those books except for the matters stated in paragraph 17(i)(vi) below on reporting under Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended);
c) The standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with Ind AS specified under section 133 of the Act;
e) The matters described in paragraph 5(i), 5(ii) and 5(iii) under the Emphasis of Matter, in our opinion, may have an adverse effect on the functioning of the Company;
f) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2024 from being appointed as a director in terms of section 164(2) of the Act;
g) The qualification remark relating to the maintenance of accounts and other matters connected therewith are as stated in the paragraph 17(b) above on reporting under Section 143(3)(b) of the Act and paragraph 17 (i) (vi) below on reporting under Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended);
h) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements of the Company as on 31 March 2024 and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in Annexure II wherein we have expressed an unmodified opinion; and
i) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company, as detailed in note 35, 37, 44D(ii), 55, 56 and 58, to the standalone financial statements, has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position as at 31 March 2024;
ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses as at 31 March 2024;
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company during the year ended 31 March 2024;
iv. a. The management has represented that, to the
best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in note 48(a) to the standalone financial statements, no funds have been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or securities premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the Company to or in any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities (‘the intermediaries’), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Company (‘the Ultimate Beneficiaries’) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf the Ultimate Beneficiaries;
b. The management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, as disclosed in note 48(b) to the standalone financial statements, no funds have been received by the Company from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign entities (‘the Funding Parties’), with the understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the Company shall, whether directly or indirectly, lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (‘Ultimate Beneficiaries’) or provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries; and
c. Based on such audit procedures performed as considered reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to our notice that has caused us to believe that the management representations under sub-clauses (a) and (b) above contain any material misstatement.
v. As stated in note 45 to the accompanying standalone financial statements, the Board of Directors of the Company have proposed final dividend for the year ended 31 March 2024 which is subject to the approval of the members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting. The dividend declared is in accordance with section 123 of the Act to the extent it applies to declaration of dividend.
vi. As stated in Note 58 to the standalone financial statements and based on our examination which included test checks, except for the instances mentioned below, the Company, in respect of financial year commencing on 01 April 2023, has used accounting software for maintaining its books of account which have a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility and the same have been operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software. Further, during the course of our audit we did not come across any instance of audit trail feature being tampered with where such feature was enabled.
a. The feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility was not enabled at the database level to log any direct data changes for the accounting software used for maintenance of accounting records and billing of subscription income for linear TV channels respectively.
b. I nternally developed accounting software used for maintenance of accounting records relating to billing of subscription income for digital channel did not have a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility.
c. The accounting software used for maintenance of payroll records is operated by a third-party software service provider. In the absence of any information on existence of audit trail (edit logs) for any direct changes made at the database level in the ‘Independent Service Auditor’s Assurance Report on the Description of Controls, their Design and Operating Effectiveness’ (‘Type 2 report’ issued in accordance with ISAE 3000, Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information), we are unable to comment on whether audit trail feature with respect to the database of the said software was enabled and operated throughout the year.
For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP
Chartered Accountants Firm’s Registration No.: 001076N/N500013
Gautam Wadhera
Partner
Place: Mumbai Membership No.: 508835
Date: 17 May 2024 UDIN: 24508835BKFFCS6756
|