In line with accounting policy of the Company, deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences and carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation and unused tax losses can be utilised and deferred tax asset (net) has been recognised only to the extent of reasonable certainty of available tax profits in future. Accordingly, the Company has not recognised deferred tax assets in respect of carried forward losses of C541,560 and C697,763 as of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023, respectively, as it is not probable that relevant taxable profits will be available in future due to uncertainty of outcome of certain tax and regulatory matters, constant capital investments and receipt of dividend from investees etc.
The above includes business combination losses and unabsorbed depreciation in relation to:
a) TTSL amounting to C128,232 (including C70,209 towards unabsorbed depreciation) as of March 31, 2024 and C137,929 (including C70,209 towards unabsorbed depreciation) as of March 31, 2023, and from Telenor totalling to C64,280 (including C42,402 towards unabsorbed depreciation) as of March 31, 2024 and C64,280 (including C42,402 towards unabsorbed depreciation) as of March 31, 2023.
b) Capital losses of C204,604 as of March 31, 2024 and C351,110 as of March 31, 2023.
c) Business losses amounting to C102,255 as of March 31, 2024 and C102,255 as of March 31, 2023 on which deferred tax asset has been reversed based on analysis of recoverability assessment basis the 10 year plan. Further, deferred tax asset has not been recognised on business losses of C42,189 and C42,189 as of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 due to uncertainty over sufficient taxable profits in future.
Besides above, the Company has also not recorded deferred tax assets in respect of impairment losses of Investment in Subsidiaries and Joint Venture amounting to C123,254 as of March 31, 2024 and C123,254 as of March 31, 2023.
b. Rights, preferences and restrictions attached to Shares
The Company has only one class of equity shares having par value of C5 each. The holder of the equity share is entitled to dividend right and voting right in the same proportion as the capital paid-up on such equity share bears to the total paid-up equity share capital of the Company. The declaration of dividend by the Company is associated with the fulfilment of interest obligation, if any, on the perpetual securities issued by one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of equity shares will be entitled to receive the remaining assets of the Company, after distribution of all preferential amounts, in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the shareholders.
c. Terms of conversion / redemption of FCCBs
The Company has outstanding FCCBs of $337.97 million and $913.7 million as of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 respectively, bearing coupon rate of 1.50% issued at par, listed on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited. As per Offering Circular issued by the Company, FCCBs are convertible into Company’s fully paid-up equity shares of C5 each at initial conversion price (as adjusted from time to time), at any time on or after February 27, 2020 and up to the close of business on February 7, 2025, at the option of the FCCB holders. FCCBs, which are not converted to fully-paid up equity shares during such specified period, are redeemable at 102.66% of their principal amount on February 17, 2025. The Conversion price is subject to adjustment w.r.t events as mentioned in Offering Circular, but cannot be below the floor price which is C452.09.
f. Aggregate number of shares issued for consideration other than cash during the period of five years immediately preceding the reporting date:
• During the year ended March 31, 2024, 79,952,427 equity shares of C5 each were issued to the FCCB holders pursuant to option exercised in accordance with Offering Circular (refer note 4 (i)).
• During the year ended March 31, 2023, 11,930,543 equity shares of C5 each were issued to the FCCB holders pursuant to option exercised in accordance with Offering Circular (refer note 4 (i)).
• During the year ended March 31, 2021, 36,469,913 equity shares of C5 each were issued on preferential basis to Lion Meadow Investment Limited, an affiliate to Warburg Pincus LLC as partial consideration for acquisition of equity shares of Bharti Telemedia Limited.
• During the year ended March 31, 2020, 970,668 equity shares of C5 each were issued to the shareholders of TTML as per the terms of the scheme of arrangement.
d) Share-based payment reserve: The Share based payment reserve is used to record the fair value of equity-settled share based payment transactions with employees.
e) Capital reserve: It pertains to capital reserve acquired pursuant to the scheme of arrangements under the Companies Act, 1956 accounted under pooling of interest method and excess of fair value of net assets acquired over consideration paid in a business combination. This reserve is not available for distribution as dividend.
f) FVTOCI reserve: The Company has elected to recognise changes in the fair value of certain investments in equity securities in OCI. These changes are accumulated within the Fair value through OCI reserve within equity.
g) Equity component of FCCBs: The equity component is the residual amount after deducting the fair value of the financial liability component from the net proceeds of the FCCBs.
h) Common control reserve: The transaction arising out of transfer of investments between entities that are under common control are accounted at their carrying amounts. The difference between the consideration paid and the carrying amount is recorded in common control reserve. The common control reserve will be transferred to retained earnings (distributable reserve) when the underlying investment is sold to a third party (entity outside the scope of common control).
16. Reserves and surplus
a) Retained earnings: Retained earnings represent the amount of accumulated earnings of the Company, re-measurement differences on defined benefits plans, gains / (losses) on common control transactions and any transfer from general reserve.
b) Securities premium: Securities premium is used to record the premium on issue of equity shares. The same is utilised in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
c) General reserve: The Company had transferred a portion of its profit before declaring dividend in respective prior years to general reserve, as stipulated under the erstwhile Companies Act, 1956. Mandatory transfer to general reserve is not required under the Act.
Further, on exercise of the stock options, the difference between the consideration (i.e. the exercise price and the related amount of share-based payment reserve) and the cost (viz. related amount of loan provided to Bharti Airtel Welfare Trust) of the corresponding stock options, is transferred to general reserve.
22. Contingencies and commitments (I) Contingent liabilities*
Claims against the Company not acknowledged as debt:
|
|
As of
|
March 31, 2024
|
March 31, 2023
|
(i) Taxes, duties and other demands (under adjudication / appeal / dispute)
|
|
- Sales Tax, Service Tax and GST
|
8,100
|
9,656
|
- Income Tax
|
412
|
7,010
|
- Custom Duty
|
499
|
499
|
- Entertainment tax
|
80
|
80
|
- Entry Tax
|
764
|
2,815
|
- Stamp Duty
|
577
|
407
|
- Dot, other regulatory demands and assessments**
|
126,785
|
112,297
|
- Other miscellaneous demands
|
142
|
143
|
(ii) Claims under legal cases including arbitration matters
|
|
- Access charges / Port charges
|
234
|
234
|
- Others
|
343
|
1,208
|
|
137,936
|
134,349
|
*Per demand order
**Includes self-assessed amounts.
|
The category wise detail of major contingent liabilities has been given below:-
a) Sales Tax, Service Tax and GST
The claims for sales tax comprised of cases relating to the appropriateness of declarations made by the Company under relevant sales tax legislations, which were primarily procedural in nature and the applicable sales tax on disposals of certain property and equipment items, ITC eligibility and VAT on value added services. Pending final decisions, the Company has deposited amounts under protest with statutory authorities for certain cases.
The service tax demands relate to Cenvat claimed on tower and related material, levy of service tax on SMS termination and employee talk time, Cenvat credit disallowed for procedural lapses.
The GST demand relates to miscellaneous interest, differences between ITC claimed and as available over portal.
b) Income Tax demand
Income tax demands mainly include the appeals filed by the Company before various appellate authorities against the disallowance by income tax authorities of certain expenses being claimed. During the year, the Company has reassessed the existing possible obligations and accordingly disclosed for such amounts.
c) Customs Duty
There are certain demands related to non-submission of export obligation discharge certificate, classification issue, valuation of goods imported and levy of antidumping duty on certain products.
d) Entry Tax
I n certain states, an entry tax is levied on receipt of material from outside the state. This position has been challenged by the Company in the respective states, on the grounds that the specific entry tax is ultra vires the Constitution. Classification issues has also been raised,
whereby, in view of the Company, the material proposed to be taxed is not covered under the specific category.
During the year ended March 31, 2017, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of entry tax levied by few States. However, Supreme Court did not conclude certain aspects such as present levies in each State is discriminatory in nature or not, leaving them open to be decided by regular benches of the Courts.
e) DoT demands / assessments includes
i. DoT had enhanced the microwave rates by introducing slab-wise rates based on the number of carriers vide circulars issued in 2006 and 2008 from erstwhile basis being allocated frequency. The Company had challenged the matter in Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (‘TDSAT’) and it has set aside the respective circulars of DoT vide its Judgment dated April 22, 2010. Thereafter, DoT has challenged the order of TDSAT before the Supreme Court, which is pending for adjudication. An amount of C27,900 which pertains to pre-migration to Unified License (‘UL) / Unified Access Service License (‘UASL’) is disclosed as contingent liability as of March 31, 2024.
ii. In 2013, DoT introduced UL Regime and notified guidelines which mandates migration to new UL regime upon expiry of existing licenses. Accordingly, the Company migrated to UL regime in 2014. The Company and Internet Service Provider (‘ISP’) Association challenged the Guidelines and provisions of UL on the ground that DoT has discriminated amongst ISP licenses in violation of principle of level playing field amongst ISPs. TDSAT stayed the payment of license fee on revenue from Pure Internet Service. In October 2019, TDSAT delivered its judgment in the ISP Association case (ISPAI Judgment) and set aside the provision to pay license fee on the revenue from pure internet service under UL. TDSAT, following ISPAI judgment, allowed the petition filed by the Company and set aside the demand notices.
DoT has filed appeal against ISPAI judgment before Supreme Court. On January 5, 2021, the Supreme Court admitted DoT’s appeal, and also allowed the Company’s intervention application, with a direction that DoT shall not be required to refund any amounts pursuant to TDSATjudgment and parties shall be bound by the final directions as may be passed by the Supreme Court.
On March 31, 2021, DoT issued amendment to the ISP Licenses granted under the old regime i.e. under 2002 and 2007 with immediate effect (April 1, 2021). Amongst others, DoT included the revenue from pure internet services in the AGR for the purposes of license fees in such contracts (which was earlier allowed as permissible deduction under old regime). Accordingly, demand up to March 31, 2021 has been assessed to
be a contingent liability (March 31, 2024: C42,424 and March 31, 2023: C35,551).
iii. Demands for the contentious matters in respect of subscriber verification norms and regulations including validity of certain documents allowed as proof of address / identity. TDSAT and High Courts have granted interim reliefs to the Company and the matters are pending for adjudication.
iv. Penalty for alleged failure to meet certain procedural requirements for EMF radiation selfcertification compliance.
v. Additional demand received for the period already covered by the AGR judgement which mainly pertains to spectrum usage charges.
The matters stated above are being contested by the Company and based on legal advice, the Company believes that it has complied with all license related regulations and does not expect any financial impact due to these matters.
In addition to the amounts disclosed in the table above, the contingent liability on DoT matters includes the following:
1) I n respect of levy of one time spectrum charge (‘OTSC’), the DoT has raised demand on the Company in January 2013. The Company challenged the OTSC demand and the High Court of Bombay vide its order dated January 28, 2013 stayed enforcement of the demand and directed DoT not to take any coercive action. The DoT has filed its reply and this matter is currently pending before High Court of Bombay. The DoT had issued revised demands on the Company aggregating C79,403 in June 2018, including a retrospective charge and a prospective charge till the expiry of the initial terms of the respective licenses. The said revised demand has subsequently also been brought within the ambit of the earlier order of no coercive action by the High Court of Bombay. The Company intends to continue to pursue its legal remedies.
Further, in a similar matter on a petition filed by another telecom service provider, the TDSAT, vide its judgment dated July 4, 2019, has set aside the DoT order for levy of OTSC with retrospective effect. Accordingly, as per the said order of the TDSAT; DoT can levy OTSC on the Spectrum beyond 6.2 MHz allotted after July 1, 2008, only from the date of allotment of such spectrum and in case of Spectrum beyond 6.2 MHz allotted before July 1, 2008, only prospectively i.e. w.e.f. January 1, 2013.
Further, demand for OTSC on spectrum allotted beyond start-up and up-to the limit of 6.2 MHz has been set aside. The TDSAT has asked DoT to issue revise demands, if any, in terms of the above directions. The said telecom service providers filed an appeal before the Supreme Court against the judgement passed by TDSAT. On March 16, 2020, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of the telecom service providers and did not interfere with the TDSAT judgment. Thereafter, the telecom service provider had filed a review petition against the judgement dated March 16, 2020. The Supreme Court allowed the review petition and restored the telecom service providers’ appeal. The matter is pending adjudication before the Supreme Court.
DoT’s appeal against the said TDSAT Order for the levy on Spectrum below 6.2 MHz is pending. The Supreme Court vide order dated August 21, 2020, stayed the TDSAT judgment July 4, 2019 in a case of another telecom service provider. The Supreme Court, vide order dated December 7, 2020, directed status quo to be maintained in case of another telecom service provider.
On account of prudence, out of the total demands of C79,403, the Company had recorded a charge of C17,914 during the year ended March 31, 2020 and interest thereon till March 31, 2024 amounting C81,186. Balance demand of C61,489 has continued to be contingent liability.
2) DoT had issued notices to the Company (as well as other telecom service providers) to stop provision of 3G services to its customers (under 3G Intra Circle Roaming (‘ICR’) arrangements executed with other service providers) in such service areas where the service provider has not been allocated 3G spectrum, and levied a penalty of C3,500 on the Company. The Company contested the notices before TDSAT, which in 2014 held 3G ICR arrangements between service providers to be competent and compliant to the licensing conditions and quashed the notice imposing penalty. The DoT has challenged the order of TDSAT before the Supreme Court which is yet to be listed for hearing.
Considering the nature of above disputes / litigations, it is difficult to reliably ascertain the amount or timing of outflow on settlement.
Guarantees:
Corporate guarantees outstanding as of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 amounting to C354,446 and C349,854 respectively have been issued by Company on behalf of its subsidiaries. These guarantees primarily relate to loans and bonds taken by these subsidiaries from banks and financial institutions amounting to C168,415 and C168,716 as of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 respectively.
(II) Commitments
Capital commitments
The Company has contractual commitments towards capital expenditure (net of related advances) of C120,964 and C191,685 as of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 respectively.
Mobile Services: These services cover voice and data telecom services provided through wireless technology (2G / 4G / 5G) in India. This includes the captive national long distance networks which primarily provide connectivity to the mobile services business in India.
Airtel Business: These services cover end-to-end telecom solutions being provided to large Indian and global corporations by serving as a single point of contact for all telecommunication needs across data and voice (domestic as well as international long distance), network integration and managed services.
Homes Services: These services cover voice and data communications through fixed-line network and broadband technology for homes.
The expected life of the stock options is based on the Company’s expectations and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may actually occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility over a period similar to the expected life of the options is indicative of future trends, which may not necessarily be the actual outcome. Further, the expected volatility is based on the weighted average volatility of the comparable benchmark companies.
Due to its defined benefits plans, the Company is exposed to the following significant risks:
Changes in bond yields - A decrease in bond yields will increase plan liability.
Salary risk - The present value of the defined benefits plans liability is calculated by reference to the future salaries of the plan participants. As such, an increase in the salary of the plan participants will increase the plan’s liability.
The above sensitivity analysis is determined based on a method that extrapolates the impact on the net defined benefits obligations, as a result of reasonable possible changes in the significant actuarial assumptions. Further, the above sensitivity analysis is based on a reasonably possible change in a particular underlying actuarial assumption, while assuming all other assumptions to be constant. In practice, this is unlikely to occur, and changes in some of the assumptions may be correlated.
The methods and types of assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis did not change compared to the prior period.
31. Exceptional items
Exceptional items comprise of the following:
i. For the year ended March 31, 2024:
a. Interest charge of C9,713 pertaining to tax treatment of adjusted revenue linked Variable License Fee from revenue expenditure to capital in nature for the purpose of computation of taxable income. (refer note 4 (iii))
b. Charge of C2,150 on account of re-assessment of regulatory levies. (refer note 4 (iii))
c. Charge of C2,689 on account of provision impairment/charge of wholly owned subsidiary.
d. Gain on account of reversal of provision amounting to C1,789 due to favorable judgement regarding deduction of TDS on discounts allowed to the prepaid distributors on sale of SIM/Recharge vouchers.
ii. For the year ended March 31, 2023:
a. Provision on account of impairment of investment in one of the joint ventures C42,764.
Tax expense include:
Net tax credit of C668 towards exceptional items for the year ended March 31, 2024.
Nil towards exceptional items for the year ended March 31, 2023.
For the year ended March 31, 2024, FCCBs (March 31, 2023: FCCBs and unpaid portion of partly paid up shares) were excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average number of equity shares as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
33. Segment reporting
The Company publishes these Financial Statements along with the Consolidated Financial Statements. In accordance with Ind AS 108, ‘Operating Segments’, the Company has disclosed the segment information only in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(c) Transactions and balances with Key Management Personnel (‘KMP’) and Directors
KMPs are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Company, directly or indirectly, including any director, whether executive or otherwise.
1. Value of PLI, as shown above, represents incentive at 100% performance level. However, the same will be paid in the next year on the basis of actual performance parameters. During the year ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, PLI of C134 and C135 respectively has been paid.
2. As the liabilities for the gratuity and compensated absences are provided on an actuarial basis, and calculated for the Company as a whole rather than each of the individual employees, the said liabilities pertaining specifically to KMP are not known and hence, not included in the above table.
3. In addition to the above:
a) C4 and C4 have been paid as dividend to KMP during the year ended March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 respectively.
4. “Other Benefits” include commission paid to Non-Executive Directors (including Independent Directors).
• Bandwidth
The Company’s leases of bandwidth comprise of dark fiber.
• Plant and equipment
The Company leases passive infrastructure for providing telecommunication services under composite contracts that include lease of passive infrastructure and land on which the passive infrastructure is built as well as maintenance, security, provision of energy and other services.
• Building
The Company’s leases of building comprise of lease of offices, warehouses and shops.
• Land
The Company’s leases of land comprise of land taken on lease on passive infrastructure is built and offices.
Company as a lessor-operating lease
The Company enters into ‘Indefeasible right to use’ (‘IRU’) arrangements wherein the right to use the assets is given over the substantial part of the asset life. However, as the title to the assets and the significant risks associated with the operation and maintenance of these assets remains with the Company, such arrangements are recognised as operating lease. The contracted price is recognised as revenue during the tenure of the agreement. Unearned IRU revenue received in advance is presented as deferred revenue within liabilities in the Balance Sheet.
i. Foreign currency risk
Foreign exchange risk arises on all recognised monetary assets and liabilities, and any highly probable forecasted transactions, which are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the Company. The Company has foreign currency trade payables, trade receivables and borrowings. However, foreign exchange exposure mainly arises from borrowings and trade payables denominated in foreign currencies.
The foreign exchange risk management policy of the Company requires it to manage the foreign exchange risk by transacting as far as possible in the functional currency. Moreover, the Company monitors the movements in currencies in which the borrowings / capex vendors are payable and manage any related foreign exchange risk, which inter-alia include entering into foreign exchange derivative contracts - as considered appropriate and whenever necessary. For further details as to foreign currency borrowings, refer note 17. Further, for the details as to the fair value of various outstanding derivative financial instruments, refer note 37.
The Company has entered into non-cancellable lease arrangements to provide dark fiber on IRU basis and tower assets on site-sharing basis. Due to the nature of these transactions, it is not possible to compute gross carrying amount, depreciation for the year and accumulated depreciation of the asset given on operating lease as of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023 and accordingly, the related disclosures are not provided.
36. Financial and Capital risk 1. Financial risk
The business activities of the Company expose it to a variety of financial risks, namely market risks (that is, foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company’s risk management strategies focus on the unpredictability of these elements and seek to minimise the potential adverse effects on its financial performance. Further, the Company uses certain derivative financial instruments to mitigate some of these risk exposures (as discussed below in this note).
The financial risk management for the Company is driven by the Company’s senior management (‘CSM’), in close coordination with the operating entities’ internal / external experts subject to necessary supervision. The Company does not undertake any speculative transactions either through derivatives or otherwise. The CSM is accountable to the Board of Directors and Audit Committee. They ensure that the Company’s financial risk-taking activities are governed by appropriate financial risk governance framework, policies and procedures. The senior management / Board of Directors of the respective operating entities periodically reviews the exposures to financial risks, and the measures taken for risk mitigation and the results thereof.
The sensitivity disclosed in the above table is mainly attributable to, in case of to foreign exchange gains / (losses) on translation of USD denominated borrowings, derivative financial instruments, trade payables, and trade receivables as at the reporting date.
The above sensitivity analysis is based on a reasonably possible change in the underlying foreign currency against the respective functional currency while assuming all other variables to be constant.
Based on the movements in the foreign exchange rates historically and the prevailing market conditions as at the reporting date, the Company’s management has concluded that the above mentioned rates used for sensitivity are reasonable benchmarks.
ii. Interest rate risk
As the Company does not have exposure to any floating-interest bearing assets, its interest income and related cash inflows are not affected by changes in market interest rates.
The Company’s interest rate risk arises mainly from borrowings.
Borrowings
Borrowings with floating and fixed interest rates expose the Company to cash flow and fair value interest rate risk respectively. However, the short-term borrowings of the Company do not have a significant fair value or cash flow interest rate risk due to their short tenure. Accordingly, the components of the debt portfolio are determined by the CSM in a manner which enables the Company to achieve an optimum debt-mix basis its overall objectives and future market expectations.
The Company monitors the interest rate movement and manages the interest rate risk based on its risk management policies, which inter-alia include entering into interest swaps contracts - as considered appropriate and whenever necessary.
The sensitivity disclosed in the above table is attributable to floating-interest rate borrowings.
The above sensitivity analysis is based on a reasonably possible change in the underlying interest rate of the Company’s borrowings in INR, USD (being the significant currencies in which it has borrowed funds), while assuming all other variables (in particular foreign currency rates) to be constant as at the reporting date.
Based on the movements in the interest rates historically and the prevailing market conditions as at the reporting date, the Company’s management has concluded that the above mentioned rates used for sensitivity are reasonable benchmarks.
iii. Price risk
The Company invests its surplus funds in various mutual funds (debt fund, equity fund, liquid schemes and income funds etc.), short term debt funds, government securities and fixed deposits. In order to manage its price risk arising from investments, the Company diversifies its portfolio in accordance with the limits set by the risk management policies. The Company has exposure across mutual fund and money market instruments.
Due to the very short tenure of money market instruments and the underlying portfolio in liquid schemes, these do not pose any significant price risk.
iv. Credit risk
Credit risk refers to the risk of default on its obligation by the counter-party, the risk of deterioration of credit-worthiness of the counter-party as well as concentration risks of financial assets, and thereby exposing the Company to potential financial losses.
The Company is exposed to credit risk mainly with respect to trade receivables, investment in bank deposits, debt securities, mutual funds and derivative financial instruments.
Trade receivables
The Trade receivables of the Company are typically non-interest bearing unsecured and derived from sales made to a large number of independent customers. As the customer base is widely distributed both economically and geographically, there is no concentration of credit risk.
As there is no independent credit rating of the customers available with the Company, the management reviews the credit-worthiness of its customers based on their financial position, past experience and other factors.
Credit risk related to the trade receivables is managed / mitigated by each business unit, basis the Company’s established policy and procedures, by setting appropriate payment terms and credit period, and by setting and monitoring internal limits on exposure to individual customers. The credit period provided by the Company to its customers generally ranges from 14-30 days except Airtel business segment wherein it ranges from 7-90 days.
The Company uses a provision matrix to measure the ECL of trade receivables, which comprise a very large numbers of small balances. Refer note 13 for details on the impairment of trade receivables.
Based on the industry practices and the business environment in which the entity operates, management considers that the trade receivables are impaired if the payments are more than 90 / 120 days past due from due date / invoice date.
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and monitors the creditworthiness of its customers to which it grants credit in its ordinary course of business. The gross carrying amount of a financial asset is written off (either partially or in full) to the extent that there is no realistic prospect of recovery. This is generally the case when the Company determines that the debtor does not have assets or sources of income that could generate sufficient cash flows to repay the amount due. Where the financial asset has been written-off, the Company continues to engage in enforcement activity to attempt to recover the receivable due. Where recoveries are made, these are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
Financial instruments and cash deposits
The Company’s treasury, in accordance with the board approved policy, maintains its cash and cash equivalents, deposits and investment in mutual funds & debt securities and enters into derivative financial instruments - with banks, financial and other institutions, having good reputation and past track record, and high credit rating. Similarly, counter-parties of the Company’s other receivables carry either no or very minimal credit risk. Further, the Company reviews the creditworthiness of the counter-parties (on the basis of its ratings, credit spreads and financial strength) of all the above assets on an ongoing basis, and if required, takes necessary mitigation measures.
v. Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. Accordingly, as a prudent liquidity risk management measure, the Company closely monitors its liquidity position and deploys a robust cash management system. It maintains adequate sources of financing including bilateral loans, debt, and overdraft from both domestic and international banks at an optimised cost. It also enjoys strong access to domestic and international capital markets across debt and equity.
Moreover, the CSM regularly monitors the rolling forecasts of the entity’s liquidity reserve (comprising of the amount of available un-drawn credit facilities and cash and cash equivalents) and the related requirements, to ensure they have sufficient cash on an on-going basis to meet operational needs while maintaining sufficient headroom at all times on its available un-drawn committed credit facilities, so that there is no breach of borrowing limits or relevant covenants on any of its borrowings. For details as to the borrowings, refer note 17.
Based on past performance and current expectations, the Company believes that the cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations and available un-drawn credit facilities, will satisfy its working capital needs, capital expenditure, investment requirements, commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations, through at least the next twelve months.
2. Capital risk
The Company’s objective while managing capital is to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern (so that it is enabled to provide returns and create value for its shareholders, and benefits for other stakeholders), support business stability and growth, ensure adherence to the covenants and restrictions imposed by lenders and / or relevant laws and regulations, and maintain an optimal and efficient capital structure so as to reduce the cost of capital. However, the key objective of the Company’s capital management is to, ensure that it maintains a stable capital structure with the focus on total equity, uphold investor; creditor and customer confidence, and ensure future development of its business activities. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may issue new shares, declare dividends, return capital to shareholders, etc.
The following methods / assumptions were used to estimate the fair values:
i. The carrying value of other bank balances, trade receivables, trade payables, short-term borrowings, floating-rate longterm borrowings, other current financial assets and liabilities approximate their fair value mainly due to the short-term maturities of these instruments / being subject to floating-rates.
ii. The fair value of non-current financial assets, other long-term borrowings and other financial liabilities is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates applicable to instruments with similar terms, currency, credit risk and remaining maturities.
iii. The fair values of derivatives are estimated by using pricing models, wherein the inputs to those models are based on readily observable market parameters. The valuation models used by the Company reflect the contractual terms of the derivatives (including the period to maturity) and market-based parameters such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, volatility etc. These models do not contain a high level of subjectivity as the valuation techniques used do not require significant judgement and inputs thereto are readily observable.
The following table describes the key inputs used in the valuation (basis discounted cash flow technique) of the Level 2
financial assets / liabilities as of March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023
39. Other matters
I n 1996, the Company had obtained the permission from DoT to operate its Punjab license through one of its wholly owned subsidiary. However, DoT cancelled the permission to operate in April 1996 and subsequently reinstated in March 1998. Accordingly, for the period from April 1996 to March 1998 (‘blackout period’) the license fee was disputed and not paid by the Company.
Subsequently, basis the demand from DoT in 2001, the Company paid the disputed license fee of C4,856 for blackout period under protest. Consequently, the license was restored subject to arbitrator’s adjudication on the dispute. The arbitrator adjudicated the matter in favour of DoT, which was challenged by the Company before Delhi High Court. In 2012, Delhi High Court passed an order setting aside the arbitrator’s award, which was challenged by DoT and is pending before its division bench. Meanwhile, the Company had filed a writ petition for recovery of the disputed license fee and interest thereto. However, the single bench, despite taking the view that the Company is entitled to refund, dismissed the writ petition. The Company therefore has filed appeal against the said order with division bench and is currently pending. DoT had also filed an appeal against the single judge order. Both these appeals are tagged together and are listed for final hearing.
43. Compliance with approved Schemes of Arrangements
All the Schemes of Arrangements, approved by the Competent Authority under the relevant provisions of the Act, have been accounted for in the books of account of the Company in accordance with the Scheme and accounting standards.
44. Audit Trail
MCA vide its notification number G.S.R. 206(E) dated March 24, 2021 (amended from time to time) in reference to the proviso to Rule 3 (1) of the Companies (Accounts) Amendment Rules, 2021, introduced the requirement w.e.f April 01, 2023, to only use such accounting software which has a feature of recording audit trail of each and every transaction.
The Company has assessed all of its IT applications including supporting applications considering the guidance provided in “Implementation guide on reporting on audit trail under rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (Revised 2024 edition)” issued by the Institute of Chartered Accounts of India in February 2024, and identified applications that are relevant for maintaining books of accounts. The Company has an IT environment which is adequately governed with General information technology controls (GITCs) for financial reporting process. During the financial year, the Company has enabled audit trail feature, in a phased manner, in certain critical applications including the ERP application (Oracle) which maintains the general ledger for financial reporting purposes. During such period, audit trail feature has operated effectively and there were no instances of audit trail feature being tampered with. Further, for the remaining applications, the Company is in the process of implementing audit trail feature.
45. Events after the reporting period
i. Subsequent to year ended March 31, 2024, the Company has signed a Definitive Agreement to combine operations of Bharti Airtel Lanka (Private) Limited (‘Airtel Lanka’), its wholly-owned subsidiary, with Dialog Axiata Plc (‘Dialog’) an Axiata Group Berhad (‘Axiata’) Company. Under this agreement, Dialog will issue to the company, ordinary voting share equal to 10.355% of the total issued shares of Dialog by way of a share swap as consideration.
The transaction is subject to various regulatory approvals including approval from Board of Investment, clearance from the Columbo stock exchange and the approval of Dialog’s shareholders and completion of specific conditions in the agreement. The impact of the transaction has been considered as a non-adjusting subsequent event.
ii. Subsequent to year ended March 31, 2024, Bharti Hexacom Limited, a subsidiary of the Company, completed its Initial Public Offering, comprising of an offer for sale by Telecommunications Consultants India Limited (selling shareholder) of 75,000,000 equity shares of C5 each at a premium of C565 per share aggregating to C42,750. The equity shares are listed and traded on BSE Limited and National Stock Exchange of India Limited with effect from April 12, 2024.
iii. Subsequent to year ended March 31, 2024, the Company has, in accordance with the terms of the Offering Circular dated January 14, 2020 w.r.t. $1,000 million 1.50% Convertible Bonds due 2025 (‘FCCBs’), allotted 18,531,748 equity shares of the face value of C5 each fully paid up, against the conversion request of FCCBs of $133.28 million.
|