q) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pretax rate that reflects, when appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. These estimates are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimates. The expense relating to a provision is recognised in the statement of profit and loss.
r) Financial instruments
A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
Financial assets
Initial recognition and measurement
All financial assets (except trade receivables) are recognised initially at fair value plus transaction costs that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset. Transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition of financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are recognised immediately in profit or loss.
Subsequent measurement
For purposes of subsequent measurement, financial assets are classified in four categories:
• Debt instruments at amortised cost;
• Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income ('FVTOCI');
• Debt instruments and derivatives at fair value through profit or loss ('FVTPL'); or
• Equity instruments at fair value through profit or loss ('FVTPL') or at fair value through other comprehensive income ('FVTOCI')
Debt instruments at amortised cost
A 'debt instrument' is measured at the amortised cost if both the following conditions are met:
a. The asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets for collecting contractual cash flows; and
b. Contractual terms of the asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely
payments of principal and interest ('SPPI') on the principal amount outstanding.
This category is the most relevant to the Company. After initial measurement, such financial assets are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate ('EIR') method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included in finance income in the statement of profit and loss. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in the statement of profit and loss.
Debt instrument at FVTOCI
A 'debt instrument' is classified as at the FVTOCI if both of the following criteria are met:
a. The objective of the business model is achieved both by collecting contractual cash flows and selling the financial assets; and
b. The asset's contractual cash flows represent SPPI.
Debt instruments included within the FVTOCI category are measured initially as well as at each reporting date at fair value. Fair value movements are recognized in the other comprehensive income ('OCI'). However, the Company recognizes interest income, impairment losses and reversals and foreign exchange gain or loss in the statement of profit and loss. On derecognition of the asset, cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in OCI is reclassified to statement of profit and loss. The Company does not have any debt instrument as at FVTOCI.
Debt instrument at FVTPL
FVTPL is a residual category for debt instruments. Any debt instrument, which does not meet the criteria for categorization as at amortized cost or as FVTOCI, is classified as at FVTPL.
In addition, the Company may elect to designate a debt instrument, which otherwise meets amortized cost or FVTOCI criteria, as at FVTPL. However, such election is allowed only if doing so reduces or eliminates a measurement or recognition inconsistency (referred to as 'accounting mismatch'). The Company has not designated any debt instrument as at FVTPL.
Debt instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognized in the statement of profit and loss. The Company does not have any debt instrument at FVTPL.
Equity investments
All equity investments in scope of Ind AS 109 are measured at fair value. Equity instruments which are held for trading are classified as at FVTPL. For all other equity instruments, the Company decides to classify the same either as at FVTOCI or FVTPL. The Company makes such election on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The classification is made on initial recognition and is irrevocable.
If the Company decides to classify an equity instrument as at FVTOCI, then all fair value changes on the instrument, excluding dividends, are recognized in the OCI. There is no recycling of the amounts from OCI to statement of profit and loss, even on sale of investment. However, the Company may transfer the cumulative gain or loss within equity.
Equity instruments included within the FVTPL category are measured at fair value with all changes recognized in the statement of profit and loss. The Company has classified its investments in mutual funds as investments at FVTPL and investments in unquoted equity instruments as investments in OCI.
Derecognition
The Company derecognises a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or when it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another party. If the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, the Company recognises its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If the Company retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, the Company continues to recognise the financial asset and also recognises a collateralised borrowing for the proceeds received.
On de-recognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and receivable is recognised in the statement of profit and loss.
Impairment of financial assets
The Company applies expected credit loss model for recognising impairment loss on financial assets measured at amortised cost.
The Company follows 'simplified approach' for recognition of impairment loss allowance on trade receivables. The application of simplified approach does not require the Company to track changes
in credit risk rather, it recognises impairment loss allowance based on lifetime expected credit loss ('ECL') at each reporting date, right from its initial recognition.
For recognition of impairment loss on loans and other financial assets, the Company determines that whether there has been a significant increase in the credit risk since initial recognition. If credit risk has not increased significantly, 12-month ECL is used to provide for impairment loss. However, if credit risk has increased significantly, lifetime ECL is used. If, in a subsequent period, credit quality of the instrument improves such that there is no longer a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition, then the entity reverts to recognising impairment loss allowance based on 12-month ECL.
Lifetime ECL are the expected credit losses resulting from all possible default events over the expected life of a financial instrument. The 12-month ECL is a portion of the lifetime ECL which results from default events that are possible within 12 months after the reporting date.
As a practical expedient, the Company uses a provision matrix to determine impairment loss allowance on portfolio of its trade receivables. The provision matrix is based on its historically observed default rates over the expected life of the trade receivables and is adjusted for forwardlooking estimates. At every reporting date, the historical observed default rates are updated and changes in the forward-looking estimates are analysed.
Impairment loss allowance (or reversal) for the year is recognized in the statement of profit and loss.
Financial liabilities
Initial recognition and measurement
All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and, in the case of financial liabilities at amortized cost, net of directly attributable transaction costs.
Subsequent measurement
All financial liabilities (except derivatives and fair value liabilities) are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments
(including all fees and points paid or received that form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life of the financial liability, or (where appropriate) a shorter period, to the net carrying amount on initial recognition.
Derecognition
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires. When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as the derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in the statement of profit and loss.
Offsetting of financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the balance sheet if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
Investments in equity instruments of subsidiaries
These are measured at cost in accordance with Ind AS 27 'Separate Financial Statements'.
s) Inventories
Inventories comprising expendable aircraft spares, miscellaneous stores and in-flight inventories which are valued at cost or net realizable value, whichever is lower after providing for obsolescence and other losses, where considered necessary. Cost includes cost of purchase and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition and is determined on a weighted average basis. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
t) Manufacturers' incentives
Cash incentives
The Company receives incentives from original equipment manufacturers ('OEMs') of aircraft components in connection with acquisition of aircraft and engines. In case of owned aircraft, incentives are recorded as a reduction to the cost of related aircraft and engines. In case of aircraft and engines held under leases, the incentives are recorded as reduction to the carrying amount of
right to use assets at the commencement of lease of the respective aircraft.
Where the aircraft is held under finance lease as per erstwhile Ind AS, the milestone incentives are deferred and recognised under the head 'Other operating revenue' in the statement of profit and loss, on a straight line basis over the remaining initial lease period of the respective aircraft for which the aircraft is expected to be used. In case of prepayment of finance lease obligations for aircraft taken on finance lease and consequently taking the ownership of the aircraft, before the expiry of the lease term, the unamortised balance of such deferred incentive is recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the aircraft.
Non-cash incentives
Non-cash incentives relating to aircraft are recorded as and when due to the Company by setting up a deferred asset and a corresponding deferred incentive. These incentives are recorded as a reduction to the cost of related aircraft and engines in case of owned aircraft. In case of aircraft held under leases, the incentives are recorded as reduction to the carrying amount of right to use assets at the commencement of lease of the respective aircraft. The deferred asset explained above is reduced on the basis of utilization against purchase of goods and services.
u) Commission to agents
Commission expense is recognized as an expense coinciding with the recognition of related revenues considering various estimates including applicable commission slabs, performance of individual agents with respect to their targets etc.
v) Share-based payment expense
Employees (including senior executives) of the Company receive remuneration in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby employees render services as consideration for equity instruments (equity-settled transactions). The cost of equity-settled transactions is determined by the fair value of instrument at the date when the grant is made using an appropriate valuation model.
That cost is recognised as employee benefits expense, together with a corresponding increase in stock options outstanding account in equity over the period in which the performance and/ or service conditions are fulfilled. The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and the Company's best estimate of the
number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The statement of profit and loss expense (or reversal) for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of that period and is recognised in employee benefits expense.
When the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, the minimum expense recognised is the expense had the terms had not been modified, if the original terms of the award are met. An additional expense is recognised for any modification that increases the total fair value of equity-settled transaction, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee as measured at the date of modification. Where an award is cancelled by the entity or by the counterparty, any remaining element of the fair value of the award is expensed immediately through statement of profit and loss.
w) Segment reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker is considered to be the Board of Directors who makes strategic decisions and is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments.
x) Contingent liabilities and contingent assets
A contingent liability is a possible obligation that arises from past events whose existence will be confirmed by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events beyond the control of Company or present obligation that is not recognized because it is not probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation. A contingent liability also arises in cases where there is a liability that cannot be recognized because it cannot be measured reliably. The Company does not recognise a contingent liability but discloses its existence in the financial statements.
Contingent assets are disclosed only when inflow of economic benefits therefrom is probable and
recognize only when realization of income is virtually certain.
y) Measurement of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (‘EBITDA')
The Company has elected to present EBITDA as a separate line item on the face of the statement of profit and loss. In its measurement, the Company does not include depreciation and amortization, finance income, finance costs and tax expense.
J. Recent accounting pronouncement and new and amended accounting standards adopted by the Company
a) Ministry of Corporate Affairs ('MCA") notifies new standards or amendments to the existing standards under Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules 2015, as issued from time to time. For the year ended March 31, 2024, MCA has not notified any new standards or amendments to the existing standards applicable to the Company.
b) The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ('MCA') vide its notification dated March 31, 2023, notified the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2023, which amended certain accounting standards (see below), and are effective April 1, 2023:
• Disclosure of accounting policies -amendments to Ind AS 1
• Definition of accounting estimates -amendments to Ind AS 8
• Deferred tax related to assets and liabilities arising from a single transaction - amendments to Ind AS 12
The other amendments to Ind AS notified by these rules are primarily in the nature of clarifications.
These amendments did not have any material impact on the amounts recognised in prior periods and are not expected to significantly affect the current or future periods.
- Second charge on pledge of shares of the Company held by the Promoter;
- Second charge on current assets and movable fixed assets of SpiceXpress and Logistics Private Limited (subsidiary
entity); and
- 100% credit guarantee by National Credit Guarantee Trust Company Limited (NCGTC)
b. During the previous year, the Company had availed term loan under Electronic Credit Line Guarantee Scheme ('ECLGS') from Yes Bank Limited amounting to Rs. 1,509.80 million. The loan is repayable in 48 equal instalments commencing after 2 years from the date of the borrowing and carries an interest rate of 9.25% (0.80% spread over MCLR rate of the bank revised every year capped at 9.25%). The loan is secured as follows:
- Second charge on movable fixed assets of the Company;
- Second charge on current assets of the Company (both present and future) including all receipts in foreign currency
and rupee credit (except lien marked deposits);
- Second charge on pledge of shares of the Company held by the Promoter; and
- 100% credit guarantee by National Credit Guarantee Trust Company Limited (NCGTC)
c. During the previous year, the Company had availed term loan under Electronic Credit Line Guarantee Scheme ('ECLGS') from Indian Bank Limited amounting to Rs. 600.00 million. The loan is repayable in 48 equal instalments commencing after 2 years from the date of the borrowing and carries an interest rate of 9.25% (1% spread over MCLR rate of the bank revised every year capped at 9.25%). The loan is secured as follows:
- Second charge on existing credit facilities in terms of cash flow (including repayment); and
- 100% credit guarantee by National Credit Guarantee Trust Company Limited (NCGTC)
d. During the previous year, the Company had availed term loan under Electronic Credit Line Guarantee Scheme ('ECLGS') from Indian Bank Limited amounting to Rs. 913.20 million (sanctioned amount: INR 1,286.40 million). The loan is repayable in 48 equal instalments commencing after 2 years from the date of the borrowing and carries an interest rate of 9.25% (1% spread over MCLR rate of the bank revised every year capped at 9.25% ). During the year, the Company has further received loan disbursement from Indian Bank amounting to 362.00 million (out of total sanctioned amount: INR 1,286.40 million). The loan is secured as follows:
- Second charge on existing credit facilities in terms of cash flow (including repayment) and securities including pledge of deposits, shares and fixed deposit;
- Second charge on current assets of the Company; and
- 100% credit guarantee by National Credit Guarantee Trust Company Limited (NCGTC)
e. The Company has availed term loan under Electronic Credit Line Guarantee Scheme ('ECLGS') from Yes Bank Limited amounting to Rs. 1,275.17 million. The loan is repayable in 48 equal instalments commencing after 2 years from the date of the borrowing and carries an interest rate of 9.25% (0.80% spread over MCLR rate of the bank revised every year capped at 9.25%). The loan is secured as follows:
- Second charge on movable fixed assets;
- Second charge on current assets of the Company (both present and future) including all receipts in foreign currency and rupee credit (except lien marked deposits);
- Second charge on pledge of shares of the Company held by the Promoter; and
- 100% credit guarantee by National Credit Guarantee Trust Company Limited (NCGTC)
f. The Company had availed term loan under Electronic Credit Line Guarantee Scheme ('ECLGS') from IDFC Bank Limited ('IDFC Bank') amounting to Rs. 200 million. The loan is repayable in 48 equal instalments commencing after 2 years from the date of the borrowing and carries an interest rate of 9.25% (1.00% spread over MCLR rate of the bank revised every year capped at 9.25%). The loan is secured as follows:
- Second pari-passu charge movable fixed assets and current assets of the Company;
- Second charge on land of the Company;
- Second charge on pledge of shares of the promoter of the Company (1.0x cover); and
- 100% credit guarantee by National Credit Guarantee Trust Company Limited (NCGTC)
(viii) Risk
Salary increases - Actual salary increases will increase the plan's liability. Increase in salary increase rate assumption in future valuations will also increase the liability.
Investment risk - If plan is funded then assets liabilities mismatch and actual investment return on assets lower than the discount rate assumed at the last valuation date can impact the liability.
Discount rate - Reduction in discount rate in subsequent valuations can increase the plan's liability.
Mortality and disability - Actual deaths and disability cases proving lower or higher than assumed in the valuation can impact the liabilities.
Withdrawals - Actual withdrawals proving higher or lower than assumed withdrawals and change of withdrawal rates at subsequent valuations can impact plan's liability.
c. Defined contribution plan:
During the year, the Company recognized Rs. 323.56 million (March 31, 2023 - Rs. 399.35 million) as provident fund expense under defined contribution plan and Rs. 15.63 million (March 31, 2023 - Rs. 28.04 million) for contributions to employee state insurance scheme in the statement of profit and loss.
45. Lease liabilities
The Company's leased assets primarily consist of leases for aircraft, aircraft components (including engines) and buildings. The Company has several lease contracts that include extension and termination options and the management has considered both the options in determination of lease term. Potential cash flows in relation to such extension options cannot be ascertained since the cash outflow for the extended period will depend on the negotiations with the lessors in the event of exercising the extension options. Under certain lease arrangements of aircraft, the Company incurs variable payments towards maintenance of the aircraft which are presented under "Supplemental lease charges - aircraft, engines and auxiliary power units".
During the year ended March 31, 2024, the Company has recognized an expense of Rs. 7,135.88 million (March 31, 2023 Rs. 4,581.57 million) on account of short term leases which represents leased aircraft, engines and auxiliary power units having a lease term of less than 12 months and other short-term leases. The portfolio of other short-term leases to which the Company is committed at the end of the reporting period is not materially different from the portfolio of other short-term leases for which expense has been recognized during the year ended March 31, 2024.
46. Capital and other commitments
a. As at March 31, 2024, the Company has commitments (net of advance) of Rs. 606,470.29 million (March 31, 2023 - Rs. 597,094.13 million) relating to the acquisition of aircraft.
b. As at March 31, 2024, the Company has commitments of Rs. 2,651.31 million (March 31, 2023 - Rs. 3,279.00 million) relating to the bank guarantees.
c. The Company has issued support letter ('letter') to its subsidiaries (other than AS Air 41 Lease (Ireland) Limited) for providing operational and financial support for a period of 12 months from the date of said letter.
47. Litigations and claims
a) Summary
i) Matters wherein management has concluded the liability to be probable have been provided for in the books. Refer note 31.
ii) Matters wherein management has concluded the liability to be possible have been disclosed under note 47 (b) below.
iii. The goods and services tax related demand pertains to differential amount of IGST on account of incorrect classification as per customs chapter tariff head pertaining to bills of entry in relation to imports of various goods, claim of input tax credit for exempt supplies and discrepancies in returns filed.
iv. The Company has received a demand notice from the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Gurgaon for Rs. 79.91 million in respect of provident fund ('PF') dues for international workers vide Notifications GSR 706(E) dated October 1, 2008 and GSR 148 dated September 3, 2010, for the period from November 2008 to February 2011. The Company has responded to the notice disputing the demand and, without admitting any liability towards the same, has deposited an amount of Rs. 1.96 million towards the PF contributions in respect of international workers for the period from November 2008 to July 2011 under the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ('PF Act'). Since August 2011, the Company has been making provident fund contributions in respect of international workers under the provisions of the PF Act. During the year ended March 31, 2012, the Company has filed a writ petition with the Hon'ble Delhi High Court contending that the above notifications relating to international workers are unreasonable and ultra vires the PF Act. The Court has directed that this matter be put up in the regular list and the interim order in favour of the Company has been made absolute till disposal of the petition. In addition, a report has been filed by the Department's Representative before the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ("RPFC") on March 22, 2017 pursuant to which there is an aggregate demand Rs. 144.43 million against the Company for the period from November 2008 to January 2012. The Company has filed its reply on the report on August 18, 2017. Thereafter, the RPFC has passed its final order on June 8, 2020 against the Company for an amount of Rs. 142.04 million towards outstanding PF dues for its expat employees for the period of November 2008 to January 2012. The RPFC order also states that there is an order in favour of the Company restraining the PF department from taking any coercive steps against the Company for recovery of the said amount till the disposal of the writ petition. Pending disposal of the writ petition, the Company has not accrued for any additional liability in respect of provident fund contributions to international workers.
v. The Company has received a demand order for a sum of Rs. 77.28 million, and applicable interest, as well as penalty of Rs. 77.28 million from the service tax department for non-remittance of service tax on reverse charge mechanism on certain payments made during the period April 18, 2006 to March 31, 2012. The Company is contesting the order on the grounds that the services obtained by the Company were not liable to service tax under the categories determined by the authorities and are hence not taxable services. Effective July 2012, pursuant to the enactment of the negative list of taxable services, the Company has been paying service tax on these services received on reverse charge basis under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. Based on advice by tax consultants and internal evaluation, the Company has provided an amount of Rs. 77.28 million (including a portion of applicable interest) on a conservative basis (also refer note 31). However, the Company continues to contest the entire demand and has filed an appeal against the adverse order with the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ('CESTAT') and is confident of its success. The balance amount of the matter under litigation, (including interest and penalty) of Rs. 170.70 million, has not been accrued pending final outcome of this matter and has been disclosed as a contingent liability.
vi. The Company has received certain show cause notices from the service tax authorities, citing various defaults, including failure/delay in remitting service tax collected, over past financial years as well as alleged failure in remittance of service tax on certain other items. Based on their assessment of the contentions of the service tax authorities, the management has submitted a detailed reply to the notice, and based on legal advice obtained, believes that the likelihood of this liability devolving on the Company is low, and accordingly has made no adjustments to the financial statements.
vii. The Company has received certain orders from customs authorities levying Integrated Goods and Services Tax ('IGST') and basic customs duty on re-import of various aircraft engines and aircraft equipment repaired/ replaced outside India, which is in the opinion of the Management and based on expert advice obtained, is not subject to such levy. Accordingly, these amounts have been considered as recoverable. Further, in January 2021, the Company has received favourable order in reference to one of the matters for which tax is paid under protest, from the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ('CESTAT'), New Delhi in respect of this matter. During the year, the customs authorities have filed an appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India ('the Supreme Court') against the CESTAT order. The matter is yet to be decided by the Supreme Court and no stay on CESTAT order has been granted by the Supreme Court till date. Further, the customs authorities vide customs amendment notification dated 19 July 2021 has amended earlier customs exemption notification to reiterate their position that IGST is applicable on re-import of goods after repair. However, the Company based on the legal advice from counsels, continues to believe that no IGST is payable on such re-import of repaired
aircraft engines and related parts. Accordingly, the above amounts, which is paid under protest till March 31, 2024 i.e. Rs. 619.58 million have been shown as recoverable.
viii. M/s Hindustan Development Corporation Limited ("HDCL") (now renamed as Mallanpur Steels Limited) who had lent Rs. 50 million by way of inter-corporate deposit to the Company, has filed an appeal before the division bench of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court against the Scheme of Settlement passed by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court wherein the Company's liability was fixed at Rs. 35 million. The Company had made a deposit of Rs. 35 million to the Official Administrator of the Scheme in accordance with approved Scheme. Pending disposition of the review petition, the likelihood of the balance amount of Rs.15 million devolving on the Company is not probable. Also, the interest (if any) on the same is not ascertainable and accordingly no adjustments have been made to the financial statements.
ix. The Competition Commission of India ("CCI") passed an order dated November 17, 2015 against, inter alia, the Company, which included a demand of Rs 424.80 million. The Company's appeal against this order with Competition Appellate Tribunal ("COMPAT") was disposed of by the COMPAT, which set aside the impugned order on technical grounds and has referred the matter back to the CCI for fresh adjudication. Subsequent thereto, the matter was reconsidered by CCI and a revised order dated March 7, 2018 imposing fine of Rs. 51 million was imposed on the Company. The Company has filed an appeal before COMPAT and based on legal advice received, management is confident of a favourable outcome in this matter and accordingly no adjustments are considered necessary in the financial statements.
x. The Company has received certain show cause notices from the income tax authorities citing various defaults, including non-deduction of tax deducted at source on certain payments. Based on their assessment of the contentions of the income tax authorities, the management has submitted a detailed reply to the notice, and based on legal advice obtained, believes that the likelihood of this liability devolving on the Company is low, and accordingly has made no adjustments to the financial statements.
xi. The customs related demand pertains to custom duty on the entire quantity of the remnant aviation turbine fuel in fuel tank arriving from foreign airport.
xii. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax ("ACIT") has filed a complaint against the Company and its erstwhile Chairman and Managing Director in their individual capacity, over delayed payment of tax deducted at source in contravention of section 276B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for financial years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The matter is sub-judice as on date and based on professional advice, the management is confident of a favourable outcome in this matter in so far as it relates to the Company. Accordingly, no adjustments are considered necessary in the financial statements.
c) Certain aircraft/engine lessors have filed application(s) under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 due to alleged non-payment. The Company has certain disputes in the matter and the amounts claimed are disputed debts and accordingly the Company is defending such matters. Basis the review of applications filed and the legal interpretation of the law supported by views of legal expert, the management is of the view that it is not possible to determine the effects of such applications as on date.
48. Non-compliance of laws and regulations
(a) There are delays in depositing Tax Deducted at Source ('TDS') and filing of TDS returns on time as per Income-tax Act, 1961, deposit of provident fund as per Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and deposit of goods and services tax and filing of returns as applicable under Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('GST Act'). To the extent ascertained, the Company has made accrual for interest on delays in payment of above-mentioned statutory dues. There are foreign currency trade receivables and trade and other payables that are overdue beyond the timelines, however, the Company is yet to seek extension from AD Bank or Reserve Bank of India ('RBI'), as the case may be, for settlement of such balances under foreign exchange management guidelines.
(b) Consequent upon slump sale of cargo business undertaking of the Company to its subsidiary (SpiceXpress and Logistics Private Limited) effective April 1, 2023, SpiceXpress and Logistics Private Limited has become unlisted material subsidiary and the Company is yet to appoint one independent director of the Compamy on the board of said unlisted material subsidiary.
The Company is in process of regularising aforesaid non-compliances under applicable law and regulations, however pending such regularisation, the impact of some of the above matters, including due to fine/penalties that may be levied is presently unascertainable and accordingly, no adjustments have been made in these stanadalone financial statements in this respect.
49. There have been certain delays in appointment of a woman independent director on the Board of Directors of the Company, holding of minimum number of committee meetings in the financial year ended March 31, 2024 under Companies Act, 2013 and issuing of financial results under Regulation 33 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulation, 2015 during the year for the quarters ended September 30, 2023, December 31, 2023 and March 31, 2024. These have been either condoned upon payment of necessary fee or exemption/waiver provided by relevant regulatory authority. The Company further identified candidate for appointment as independent woman director subject to necessary security clearance and approvals. The impact of the above matters does not have any material impact in these standalone financial statements in this respect.
50. Advance money received against securities proposed to be issued
The Company had, in earlier financial years, received amounts aggregating to Rs. 5,790.90 million from Mr. Kalanithi Maran and KAL Airways Private Limited (together, "Erstwhile Promoters") as advance money towards proposed allotment/subscription of certain securities (189,091,378 share warrants and 3,750,000 non-convertible cumulative redeemable preference shares, issuable based on approvals to be obtained), to be adjusted at the time those securities were to be issued. Pursuant to the legal proceedings in this regard before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi ("Court") between the Erstwhile Promoters, the present promoter and the Company, the Company was required to secure an amount of Rs. 3,290.89 million through a bank guarantee in favour of the Registrar General of the Court ("Registrar") and to deposit the balance amount of Rs. 2,500 million with the Registrar. The Company has complied with these requirements in September 2017.
The parties to the aforementioned litigation concurrently initiated arbitration proceedings before a three-member arbitral tribunal (the "Tribunal"), which pronounced its award on July 20, 2018 (the "Award"). In terms of the Award, the Company was required to (a) refund an amount of approximately Rs. 3,082.19 million to the counterparty, (b) explore the possibility of allotting non-convertible cumulative redeemable preference shares in respect of Rs. 2,708.70 million, failing which, refund such amount to the counterparty, and (c) pay interest calculated to be Rs. 924.66 million (being interest on the amount stated under (a) above, in terms of the Award). The amounts referred to under (a) and (b) above, aggregating Rs. 5,790.89 million, continue to be carried as current liabilities without prejudice to the rights of the Company under law. Further, the Company was entitled to receive from the counterparty, under the said Award, an amount of Rs. 290.00 million of past interest/servicing charges. Consequent to the Award, and without prejudice to the rights and remedies it may have in the matter, the Company accounted for Rs. 634.66 million as an exceptional item (net) during the year ended March 31, 2019, being the net effect of amount referred to under (c) and counter claim receivable of Rs. 290.00 million, above.
The Company deposited the entire principal of Rs. 5,790.9 million as per the direction of the Court in September 2017 which has also been subsequently paid to the counterparty and there are adjustments to be made for the counter-claim of the Company. The Company has additionally paid in aggregate Rs. 1,500.00 million to the counterparties pursuant to Court orders dated August 24, 2023 and February 2, 2024 while keeping open the rights and contentions in pending litigations. All the payment made to the counterparties has been included under other non-current assets.
The Company, its present promoter and the counterparties challenged various aspects of the Award, including the above-mentioned interest obligations and rights, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 which was dismissed by the Court vide its judgments dated July 31, 2023. Thereafter, the Company and its present promoter preferred an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Division Bench of the Court, inter-alia, challenging the payment of entire interest amount and payment of early refund of Rs. 2,708.70 million towards nonconvertible cumulative redeemable preference shares. The Division Bench vide its judgment dated May 17, 2024 set aside the judgments dated July 31, 2023 of the Court and ordered to restore the petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the Company and present promoter before the appropriate Court for being considered afresh and bearing in mind the observations rendered by the Division Bench in its judgment dated May 17, 2024. Accordingly, this matter is sub-judice as on date.
In view of the foregoing and pending outcome of the aforesaid challenges at the Court and legal advice obtained, the management is of the view that no material liability is likely to arise from aforesaid matter and accordingly, no further adjustments have been made in this regard, to these standalone financial statements. The auditors have included 'Emphasis of Matter' paragraph in their audit report in this regard.
51. The Company entered into a Business Transfer Agreement ("BTA") with its subsidiary namely SpiceXpress and Logistics Private Limited ("SXPL") on March 31, 2023 for transfer of its cargo business undertaking as a going concern, on slump sale basis, for a total consideration of Rs. 25,55770 million. Accordingly, SXPL is now carrying cargo business effective April 1, 2023. As per terms of the BTA, the slump sale consideration is to be discharged by SXPL by issuance of securities in the combination of equity shares and compulsorily convertible debentures. Pending issuance of securities, the consideration has been disclosed as other non-current receivables in the balance sheet. During the year, SXPL has issued 5,000,000
The Management considers that the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities (except lease liabilities) recognised in the financial statements approximate their fair values. The fair value of the financial assets and liabilities is included at the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The following methods were used to estimate the fair values:-
• Cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables, and other current and non-current financial liabilities and other current and non-current financial assets approximate their carrying amounts largely due to the short-term maturities of these financial instruments.
• The borrowings of the Company do not have any comparable instrument having the similar terms and conditions with related security being pledged and hence the carrying value of the borrowings represents the best estimate of fair value.
56. Fair value hierarchy
The following explains the judgements and estimates made in determining the fair values of the financial instruments that are recognised and measured at fair value. To provide an indication about the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, the Company has classified its financial instruments into the three levels prescribed under the accounting standard.
Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for financial instruments
Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly
Level 3: unobservable inputs for the asset or liability Valuation techniques used to determine fair value
Level 1 - The use of net asset value for mutual funds on the basis of the statement received from investee party.
Level 3 - The investment in equity shares of Aeronautical Radio of Thailand Limited is not significant. Hence, the Company has considered carrying value as fair value.
The following table provides the fair value measurement hierarchy of the Company's assets and liabilities are measured at fair value in the Balance Sheet.
57. Financial risk management objectives and policies
The Company is exposed to market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company's senior management oversees the management of these risks. The Company's senior management is supported by a treasury team. The treasury team provides assurance to the Company's senior management that the Company's financial risk activities are governed by appropriate policies and procedures and that financial risks are identified, measured and managed in accordance with the Company's policies and risk objectives. The Board of Directors reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks, which are summarised below:
Market risk
Market risk is the risk of any loss in future earnings, in realizable fair values or in future cash flows that may result from a change in the price of a financial instrument. Market risk comprises three types of risk: price risk, interest rate risk and foreign currency risk.
The sensitivity analyses in the following sections relate to the position as at March 31, 2024 and March 31, 2023.
Price risk
The Company's exposure to price risk arises from investments held and classified as FVTPL. To manage the price risk arising from investments in mutual funds, the Company diversifies its portfolio of assets.
Sensitivity analysis
If price had been 50 basis points higher/lower and all other variables were held constant, the Company's loss for the year ended March 31, 2024 would decrease/increase by Rs. 0.25 million (March 31, 2023: decrease/increase by Rs. 0.23 million).
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk because it borrows funds at floating interest rates. The risk is managed by the Company by maintaining an appropriate mix between fixed and floating rate borrowings. As at March 31, 2024 approximately 83.70% of the Company's borrowings are at a variable rate of interest (March 31, 2023 - 88.58%)
Interest rate sensitivity
If interest rates had been 50 basis points higher/lower and all other variables were held constant, the Company's loss for the year ended March 31, 2024 would increase by Rs. 28.74 million and decrease by Rs. 86.50 million respectively (March 31, 2023: increase by Rs. 20.23 million and decrease by Rs. 47.82 million respectively).
In management's opinion, the sensitivity analysis is unrepresentative of the inherent interest rate risk because the exposure at the end of the reporting period does not reflect the exposure during the year.
Foreign currency risk
Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of an exposure will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates.
Foreign currency sensitivity
The following demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in the foreign currency exchange rates, with all other variables held constant. The impact on the Company's loss before tax is due to changes in the fair value of monetary assets and liabilities including non-designated foreign currency derivatives. The sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding unhedged foreign currency denominated monetary items.
If the foreign currency rates had been 5% higher/lower and all other variables were held constant, the Company's loss for the year ended March 31, 2024 would increase/decrease by Rs. 3,183.03 million (March 31, 2023: increase/decrease by Rs. 4,611.32 million).
In management's opinion, the sensitivity analysis is unrepresentative of the inherent foreign exchange risk because the exposure at the end of the reporting period does not reflect the exposure during the year.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that counterparty will not meet its obligations under a financial instrument or customer contract, leading to a financial loss. The Company is exposed to credit risk from its operating activities (primarily trade receivables) and from its investing activities, including deposits with banks and financial institutions, foreign exchange transactions and other financial instruments.
The Company has adopted a policy of only dealing with creditworthy counterparties, as a means of mitigating the risk of financial loss from defaults. Trade receivables are typically unsecured. Majority of the Company's passenger revenue is made against deposits made by agents. Trade receivables primarily comprise of domestic customers, which are fragmented and are not concentrated to individual customers. The Company's exposure and the credit ratings of its counterparties are continuously monitored. At March 31, 2024, the Company had 34 customers (March 31, 2023: 45 customers) that owed the Company more than Rs. 10 million each and accounted for approximately 81% (March 31, 2023: 77%) of all the receivables outstanding.
An impairment analysis is performed at each reporting date on an individual basis for major customers. In addition, a large number of minor receivables are grouped into homogenous groups and assessed for impairment collectively. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of each class of financial assets. The Company does not hold collateral as security. The Company evaluates the concentration of risk with respect to trade receivables as low, as its customers are widely dispersed and operate in largely independent markets. The average credit period ranges between 30 and 90 days.
The Company uses an accounting software for maintaining its books of account which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility. The audit trail (edit log) feature for any direct changes made at the database level was not enabled for the said accounting software used for maintenance of all the accounting records by the Company, however, the audit trails (edit log) at the application level was operating for all relevant transactions recorded in the software.
Further, the Company, has used accounting software for maintenance of revenue records and payroll records which are operated by third-party software service providers which have a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility. Presently, the log has been activated at the application level. Availability of audit trail (edit logs) at database level is not covered in the 'Independent Service Auditor's Assurance Report on the Description of Controls, their Design and Operating Effectiveness' ('Type 2 report' issued in accordance with ISAE 3402, Assurance Reports on Controls at a Service Organisation).
63. Other statutory information
A. The Company has not advanced or loaned or invested funds to any person or any entity, including foreign entities (Intermediaries) with the understanding that the intermediary shall:
(i) directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by a or on behalf of the Company (Ultimate Beneficiaries); or
(ii) provide any guarantee, security or the like to or on behalf of the ultimate beneficiaries.
B. The Company has not received any fund from any person or any entity, including foreign entities (Funding Party) with the understanding (whether recorded in writing or otherwise) that the Company shall:
(i) directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by a or on behalf of the Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries); or
(ii) provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries.
C. The Company have transactions and outstanding balances during the current year with companies struck off under section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 or section 560 of Companies Act, 1956.
D. The Company does not have any Benami Property, where any proceeding has been initiated or pending against the Company.
E. The Company does not have any charges or satisfaction which is yet to be registered with Registrar of Companies beyond the statutory period.
F. The Company has not traded or invested in crypto currency or virtual currency during the year.
G. The Company does not have any transaction which is not recorded in the books of accounts that has been surrendered or disclosed as income during the year in the tax assessments under the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (such as, search or survey or any other relevant provisions of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.
H. The Company has not been declared as a 'Wilful Defaulter' by any bank or financial institution (as defined under the Companies Act, 2013) or consortium thereof, in accordance with the guidelines on wilful defaulters issued by the Reserve Bank of India.
I. The Company has complied with numbers of layers prescribed under Rule (87) of section 2 of the Act read with Companies (Restrcition on number of layers) Rules, 2017.
64. Previous year figures have been regrouped/reclassified to conform to the current year's classification. The impact of such reclassification/regrouping is not material to the financial statements.
65. Adoption of accounts
The standalone financial statements were approved for issue by the Board of Directors on July 15, 2024.
The accompanying notes to the standalone financial statements including summary of material accounting policies and other explanatory information are an integral part of these standalone financial statements.
For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP For and on behalf of the Board of Directors
Chartered Accountants
ICAI Firm Registration No.: 001076N/N500013
Neeraj Goel Ajay Singh Joyakesh Podder Chandan Sand
Partner Chairman & Managing Deputy Chief Company Secretary
Membership No: 099514 Director Financial Officer
Place: Gurugram Place: Gurugram Place: Gurugram Place: Gurugram
Date: July 15, 2024 Date: July 15, 2024 Date: July 15, 2024 Date: July 15, 2024
|